Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Implant success rates in full-arch rehabilitations supported by upright and tilted implants: a retrospective investigation with up to five years of follow-up

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 2015³â 45±Ç 6È£ p.210 ~ 215
Luca Francetti, Andrea Rodolfi, Bruno Barbaro, Silvio Taschieri, Nicolo Cavalli, Stefano Corbella,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Luca Francetti ) - Italy Research Centre in Oral Implantology Surgical and Dental Sciences Department of Biomedical Universita degli Studi di Milano
 ( Andrea Rodolfi ) - Italy Research Centre in Oral Implantology Surgical and Dental Sciences Department of Biomedical Universita degli Studi di Milano
 ( Bruno Barbaro ) - Italy Research Centre in Oral Implantology Surgical and Dental Sciences Department of Biomedical Universita degli Studi di Milano
 ( Silvio Taschieri ) - Italy Research Centre in Oral Implantology Surgical and Dental Sciences Department of Biomedical Universita degli Studi di Milano
 ( Nicolo Cavalli ) - Italy Research Centre in Oral Implantology Surgical and Dental Sciences Department of Biomedical Universita degli Studi di Milano
 ( Stefano Corbella ) - Italy Research Centre in Oral Implantology Surgical and Dental Sciences Department of Biomedical Universita degli Studi di Milano

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the cumulative success rate, the implant survival rate, and the occurrence of biological complications in implants supporting full-arch immediately loaded rehabilitations supported by upright and tilted implants.

Methods: The clinical records and periapical radiographs of patients who attended follow-up visits were collected, and information was recorded regarding marginal bone loss resorption, the occurrence of peri-implant infectious diseases, and the implant survival rate. Implants were classified as successful or not successful according to two distinct classifications for implant success.

Results: A total of 53 maxillary and mandibular restorations including 212 implants were analysed, of which 56 implants were studied over the full five-year follow-up period. After five years, the cumulative success rate was 76.04% according to the Misch classification and 56.34% according to the Albrektsson classification. The cumulative implant survival rate was 100%, although one implant was found to be affected by peri-implantitis at the second follow-up visit.

Conclusions: The cumulative success rate of the implants dropped over time, corresponding to the progression of marginal bone resorption. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was very low, and the implant survival rate was not found to be related to the cumulative success rate.

Å°¿öµå

Bone resorption; Dental implants; Dental restoration failure; Implant-supported dental prosthesis; Peri-implantitis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI